Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(SCDRC) 5757
BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PERMANENT CIRCUIT BENCH, BELAGAVI
Ravishankar, Judicial Member
SMT. LAXMI BASAPPA HALATTI – Appellant
Versus
MAHADEV PUJARI – Respondent
Appeal Execution No.33/2O26
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.A. Patil
For the Respondents: Mohal Malge, Vijaya Lakshmi
An execution proceeding may be closed and the associated appeal execution disposed of when the parties reach a settlement and comply with the terms of the original order.
Headnote:The matter pertains to an Appeal Execution filed against an order passed by the Additional District Consumer Commission, Belagavi. The parties appeared before the Commission and submitted a joint memo stating that the matter had been settled by complying with the original order. The primary issue was whether the execution proceedings should continue in light of the settlement. The court observed that since the entire order was complied with and the parties reached a settlement, the execution of the sentence was no longer required. In view of the joint memo and settlement, the A Execution is a-lso dlsposed o;ff.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural recording of party appearances and the submission of a joint settlement memo. (Para 1) |
Appeal Execution received through Shri K.A. Patil Advocate, filed on 1010612026.
This is an Appeal Execution preferred against the order passed by the Addl District Consumer Commission, Belagavi on 2910812025 in EA No.2612022 placed before this Commissionon2210612026 at 2:30 PM.
1) Order dated: 29 10812025
2) Delay :NIL
3) IA for Stay Application: Filed
4) IA for condonation of delay: Not filed
E-Dakhil Ref No :202 5 I 0 I 50 I 34, Dtdil 5 I I 0 /2025
Statutory Deposit :No
SBI Collect Ref No:--
(NOTE: This A.E. is filed on 1511012025 through online, but physical copy submitted to the oflice on 1010612026)
Asst. Registrar-c -Asst Administrative fficer
22.06.2026
Appellant : Shri K.A .Patil, Adv
For Hearing on Admission
22.06.2026
BY THE HON'BLE SRI RAVISHANKAR JUDICHL MEUBER
Case is ca-lled out.
Heard on erlrnission. lssue notice to tJre respondents, at this junction of time Sri. Mohal Malge, advocate take notice of this appeal memorandum and frled vakalath on behalf of respondent No.1 and Smt.Vijaya Lakshmi, advocate also take notice on behalf of respondent No.2 to 12 and files vakalath.
Advocate for both parties also filed joint memo stating that, the matter is settled by complying the order.
The advocate for appellant submits that, the sentence passed in this Execution is required to be suspended in view of the compliance. All the respondents in person present through V.C. and submit that, the entire order was complied by settling t]1e matter. Therefore, they do not want to press on the execution.
Considering the submission made by the parties, the order passed by the District Commission in this Execution is hereby set aside and the direction is given to the District Commission to close the Execution Petition on the next date of hearing.
In view of the joint memo and settlement, the A Execution is a-lso dlsposed o;ff.
