Back
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JJ
CITIZENS WHISTLE BLOWER FORUM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on indiabulls and alleged financial misconduct (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. allegations of fund misappropriation and violations (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. response from regulatory bodies on the allegations (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. findings of special audits conducted on indiabulls (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. legal principles regarding agency authority for investigation (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. court's summary of findings and dismissal of the petition (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 7. court's conclusion and rationale for dismissal (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
JUDGMENT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
1. The petitioner-organisation, claims to be a registered organization, working to provide a platform to whistleblowers across the country and to take up litigation on their behalf in order to provide them anonymity and to instill in them the necessary confidence to make disclosures without fear, arrange for their objective and impartial investigation and help to take such cases to their logical conclusions in a time b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
