Back
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ, MR. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
ATUL AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
UOI & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. investor protection mechanisms and statutory powers (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. reliefs and requests by the petitioner (Para 7) |
| 3. sebi's regulatory framework and response to allegations (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. regulatory measures for investor protection (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. delisting procedures and safeguards (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. suspension and re-admission conditions for securities (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. ministry's role in investor protection (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. powers and duties of sebi for regulating securities market (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 9. appeal mechanisms for aggrieved investors (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 10. overall protection regulations for investors (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 11. court's conclusion on investor protection (Para 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, C.J.
1. The present petition has been filed as a public interest litigation by the Petitioner Atul Aggarwal who is holding a Bachelor’s Degree in Law stating that he is espousing the cause millions of investors who are being duped by the unscrupulous promoters of the companies as the promoters of the companies vanish after siphoning
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
