Back
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
E.S.INDIRESH, J
VISION-EI-TECH & SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SECURITY AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issues in clubbed writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. wp 3525 facts: former director challenges sebi notice. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. wp 3519 facts: insider trading allegations against director. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. wp 25261 facts: companies challenge sebi jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. petitioners argue dgm lacks jurisdiction under section 15-i. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. additional arguments on penalty, delay, and upsi access. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. no connection to lvb; notices by incompetent authority. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. respondents defend delegation under sections 11b, 19. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 9. notices pre-determined, violate natural justice principles. (Para 40 , 41 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 10. statutory interpretation: section 15-i mandates division chief. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 11. writ maintainable against incompetent authority notices. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 12. notices quashed for lack of jurisdiction and fairness. (Para 70) |
CAV ORDER
1. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are assailing the notice dated 2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
