SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Sikk) 36

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
The Brance Manager National Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Hasmukh Pannalal Punamiya and Ors. – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction)

DATED : 2nd May, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------

SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAC App. No.24 of 2024 Appellant : The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited versus Respondents : Hasmukh Pannalal Punamiya and Others Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appearance Mr. Madan Kumar Sundas, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Rahul Rathi, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Sushant Subba, Advocate, for the Respondent No.4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. The Claimants/Respondents No.1 to 3 herein were granted compensation of ₹ 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs) only, vide the impugned Judgment, dated 12-08-2024, by the Learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gangtok, Sikkim (herein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top