SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Sikk) 43

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
KARNA BAHADUR BISWAKARMA @ KARNAY – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Criminal Appeal Jurisdiction)

DATED : 4th June, 2025 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DIVISION BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Crl.A. No.12 of 2024 Appellant : Karna Bahadur Biswakarma alias Karnay versus Respondent : State of Sikkim Appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Appearance Mr. Sunil Baraily, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the Appellant.

Mr. S K. Chettri, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Sujan Sunwar, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State-Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. The only challenge in the instant Appeal is to the sentence meted out to the Appellant, which was for a period of twenty years each, under Sections 5(l) and 5(j) punishable

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top