SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Sikk) 79

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
CHANDRA MAYA SUNWAR – Appellant
Versus
GEETA MUKHIA AND ANO. – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) DATED : 17th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SINGLE BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAC App. No.10 of 2024 Appellant : Chandra Maya Sunwar versus Respondents : Geeta Mukhia and Another Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appearance Mr. Tshewang Namgyal, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. K. B. Chettri, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Dipayan Roy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. The instant Appeal arises out of the grievance of the Claimant/Appellant, on account of the Learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gangtok, Sikkim (hereinafter, “MACT”), disposing of the matter as one under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter, the “MV Act”), instea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top