SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Sikk) 82

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
ARJUN KUMAR PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF SIKKIM – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK (Criminal Appeal Jurisdiction)

DATED : 19th June, 2025 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DIVISION BENCH : THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Crl.A. No.21 of 2024 Appellant : Arjun Kumar Prasad versus Respondent : State of Sikkim Application under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 --------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Appearance Ms. Neha Gupta, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Yadev Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-

Respondent.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. The Appellant was charged with the offence under Section 5(j)(ii), punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter, “POCSO Act”) and Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, “IPC”). He was convi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top