SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(Sikk) 5

HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Kashikant Jha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Sikkim – Respondent


Advocates:
['Kashikant Jha', '', 'Mr Ranjit Prasad', 'Ms K D Bhutia', 'Mr Pujan Kharka', 'Ms Pollin Rai', 'Asst Public Prosecutor']

ORDER

(20th June 2016)

S. K. Agnihotri, J

1. Questioning the legality and the validity of the judgment dated 05.02.2015 rendered in Criminal Appeal No.06 of 2014 by the Court of Sessions Judge, Special Division-II, at Gangtok, East Sikkim, the instant Criminal Revision Petition under Provisions of Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. is filed.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on a complaint made by one Mr. Madhav Sharma S/o of Mrs. Bishnu Maya Sharma, that he had received a forged marks statement, purported to have been issued by the Central Board of Secondary Examination (CBSE), Delhi from the convict/petitioner, herein, which was surrendered to the Vigilance Police, Gangtok and on the basis of the said complaint a search warrant was issued under the authority of Chief Judicial Magistrate (East & North) at Gangtok, on 19th September, 2001.

3. On 20th September, 2001, a search of the convict’s/petitioner’s residence at Tadong, Gangtok, was conducted, wherefrom, total (61) sixty one documents were seized, most of the said documents were of photocopies of the marks statement, admit cards etc of the various stu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top