Back
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
MR. JUSTICE RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM, J
DIGI CABLECOMM SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
DILIP RAJAK (SOLE PROPRIETOR OF B.R. COMMUNICATION) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim for outstanding dues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondent's denial of claims. (Para 4) |
| 3. issues framed for adjudication. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. burden of proof principles. (Para 9) |
| 5. undisputed facts regarding parties' operations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. no security deposit required. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 7. evidence of stb delivery and return. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. respondent's failure to provide evidence. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. petitioner's burden of proof met. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 10. petitioner’s evidence on accounts. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 11. refund of security not applicable. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 12. petitioner's claims substantiated. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 13. petition allowed for dues and stbs. (Para 32) |
| 14. order for payment and return of stbs. (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT
1. This petition, under Section 14, read with Section 14A, of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, as amended to date, (hereinafter referred to as ‘TRAI Act’), has been filed by Petitioner. DIGI Cablecomm Services Pvt. Ltd., against Dilip Rajak, sole proprietor of B.R Communication P-47, Swarup Kalika Place, Naskarhat, Ballygunge, Kolkata-700039, West Bengal, with a prayer for a Decree of Rs. 37,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
