SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 58

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
S. KIRAN KUMAR HYDERABAD A.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE VICE CHAIRMANAND MANAGING DIRECTOR APSRTC. HYDERABAD AND2OT – Respondent


ORDER

Since the subject matter of the writ petitions is one and the same, all are heard together and disposed of by this common order.

The case of the petitioners is that their lands were acquired for establishment of M/s. Orient Cement Factory, Devapur, Kasipet Mandal Adilabad District and while establishing the same, an agreement has been entered into between the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the Orient Cement Factory and as per clause 3(c) of the said agreement, each family displaced by the acquisition of land, at least one member of the family shall be given employment in the proposed Cement Factory and the District Collector, Adilabad shall be the final authority to decide who are the families displaced by the land acquisition. The list of families affected by the land acquisition, shall not be limited only to the legal pattadars. The Collector will also specify which member of the family is to be given employment in case of dispute.

The decision of the Collector shall be final and binding on the company. Though the petitioners filed several representations before the District Collector, no action has not been taken. It is also submitted that though this Court granted interim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top