SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 23462

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
ADDAKATLA RAVI KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SIDDAGONI YADAGIRI AND ANOTHER – Respondent


JUDGMENT:Dissatisfied and aggrieved with the quantum of compensation awarded vide Order and Decree dated 22.03.2016 passed in Motor Vehicle Original Petition No.1313 of 2013 (impugned Order) by the learned Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (hereinafter referred as ‘the Tribunal’), appellants- claimants preferred the present Appeal praying this Court seeking enhancement of compensation amount.

02. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array before the learned Tribunal.

03. Brief facts of the case are that: Claimants filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, before the learned Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the death of Sri Addakatla Varun (hereinafter referred as ‘the deceased’) in a Motor Vehicle Accident that occurred on 24.01.2013. Claimants are parents, minor sister and paternal grandparents of the deceased.

04. According to claimant, on 24.01.2013 at about 11:30 AM., the deceased along with his friend Gadipudi Mani Kumar were proceeding on cycle and when they reached near Lingagiri bye pass road, a Lorry bearing No. AP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top