Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
SMT.M.MARATHAMMA AND 3 ORS – Appellant
Versus
P.KUMAR AND ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for compensation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the accident (Para 3) |
| 3. police case registration (Para 4) |
| 4. claim petition details (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. claimants' arguments (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. insurance company's defense (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. court's determination point (Para 13) |
| 8. income estimation principle (Para 16) |
| 9. compensation calculation (Para 17 , 18) |
| 10. final compensation awarded (Para 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT:
1. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal- cum – Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short, the Tribunal), in O.P.No.2044 of 2012, dated 18.02.2016, the claim petitioners in the said O.P preferred the present Appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred as they were arrayed before the learned Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners, who are the wife, children and mother of Late M.Siva Nagulaiah (hereinafter be referred as ‘the deceased’), filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for the death of the deceased- M.Siva Nagulaiah in a motor vehicle a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
