Back
2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 5871
[ 32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE I I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT GASE No: 604 OF 2018 I i Contempt Case under Sections 10 to '|2 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents for their witlful, blatant and utter violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No. 17191 of 2013 in WP No. 14082 of 2013, dated
30-04-2013.
Between:
SYED ZAMIN HUSSAIN, S/o. Late Syed Naser Hussain, Aged about 67 years, Occ LandLord, Rl/o H.No 16-5-155, Farhatnagar, Dabeerpura, Hyderabad, Rep by his GPA, Mohammed Naseeruddin S/o Mohammed Mastan Aged about 58 years, Occ Business,R/o H.No 16-1-2616/6/8/4, Sayedabad Colony, Hyderabad.
... Petitione r/Petitione r AND .
'l Smt.V.Viiaya Laxmi,, Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Rajendra Nagar Circle
11, at Raiendranagar, 2.
Sri.P.B.Swamy,, The Assistant Town Planner, Rajendranagar. Rajendra Nagar Circle 11, at Rajendranagar.
3.
Jana Chaitanya Housing Society Limited,, Ameerpet, Hyderabad 16, Rep, by its M.D.Sri. M.Sudhakar, Aged about 52 years, Fl/o H.No.6-3-802, ll Floor, Zainab Complex Ameerpet X Roads, Hyderabad 16.
...Respondents/Responde nts lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 and 2 to take immediate action by preventing from further constructions in respect of property land in Sy. No 83 and 84 adm, Ac. 5- 13 guntas, situated at Upparpally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal and It/unicipality, Ranga Reddy District.
- --7 r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. HARISH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: SRI P. KRISHNA REDDY (SC FOR GHMC)
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO.6O4 OF 2OI8 (
ORDER:
I I I This Contempl Cose is filed by the petitioner ogoinst the respondenls olleging wilful ond deliberole violotion of the order doled 30.04.2013, possed by lhis Court in W.P.M.P.No.17191 of
20]3 in W.P.No.l4082of 2013
2. During lhe pendency of the confempt cose, respondent Nos.I ond 2 tiled cs counter offidovit.
3. Leorned Stonding Counsel for respondent Nos.l ond
2 submits thol lhe municipol corporotion by following due l procedure removed the illegol constructions corried out by I responclent No.3. He further submits the writ pelition olso I dismissed os withdrown on 01 .O7.2021 .
4. In view of the complionce of interim orders ond olso disposol of lhe writ petition. the couse in ihe Contempt Cose no longer survives for odjudicotion /
CVBR,J C.C No.6O4 2018
5. Accordingly, lhe Contempt Cose is closed, os no further orders ore necessory. No costs.
As o sequel, miscelloneous opplicolions pending if ony in lhis Coniempt Cose. sholl slond closed.
sd/. M. MANJULA DEPUTY REGTS //TRUE COPY// 12 -.'-
SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI' K HARISH KUMAR' Advocate [OPUCI
2. One CC to SRI P' KRISHNA REDDY' SC FOR GHMC IOPUCI
3. Tw o yD CoPies kam HIGH COURT CVBR,J DATED:1410212023 STATE O :{+
2
1$B .a tr t \\\\
o o ,).
\*
:-^--"
ORDER CC.No.604 of 2018 THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED
1,"
