SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 16073

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
Mohammaed Nadeem Ullah Khan – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Akber Ali – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by the order and decree dated 08.06.2022 in I.A.No.505 of 2022 in O.S.No.34 of 2022 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge – cum – Assistant Sessions Judge, Sangareddy (hereinafter will be referred as ‘trial Court’), the plaintiff preferred the present appeal to set aside the impugned order.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts of the case, which necessitated the plaintiff/appellant to file the present appeal, are that the plaintiff filed O.S.No.34 of 2022 against defendants seeking cancellation of two sale deeds dated 16.04.2021 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of defendant Nos.2 and 3 respectively and declaring them as null, void and not binding on the plaintiff and for a consequential perpetual injunction in respect of suit schedule properties. After receipt of summons, the defendant filed petition vide I.A.No.505 of 2022 under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint. The brief averments of the affidavit filed in support of the petition are as under:

i) The s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top