SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 585

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.SURENDER, J
Kaushik Raj Yadav Koushik – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER:

1. The petitioners, who are children in conflict with law are questioning the cancellation of bail granted to them in an offence of murder vide order in Crl.M.P.No.962 of 2022 in Cr.No.100 of 2022 passed by V Additional Metropolitan Magistrate cum-Principal Magistrate of Juvenile Justice Board.

2. The case of the prosecution is that one Jagadish Prasad Panwar, S/o.Ram Bagar Panwar filed complaint stating that he has two grandsons namely Neeraj Panwar and Harsh Panwar. Neeraj Panwar married one Sanjana without the consent of elders and they were blessed with a baby boy and staying at Falaknuma. Sanjana(cid:146)s family members did not accept the marriage and developed animosity against Neeraj Panwar. On 20.05.2022, when he along with Neeraj were going on a bike, Sanjana(cid:146)s cousin brother Vijay Yadav and his friends attacked them with knives and boulders. Neeraj Pawar received bleeding injuries and while undergoing treatment in Osmania Hospital, he expired. The names of these petitioners are not stated in the FIR. However, during the course of investigation, these petitioners were arrested as being part of members who attacked said Neeraj Panwar and caused his death.

3. B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top