SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 12367

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
ALOK ARADHE, CJ, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J
The Secunderabad Cantonment Board – Appellant
Versus
Khajka Abdul Samad – Respondent


Order:

On perusal of reports and records it is evident that the subject matter extent of Ac.21-04 gts was left un-surveyed during the last survey in the year 1940 for the obvious reasons that it did not form part of the holdings at that time. There are multiple claims on this land by the cantonment board and private parties. The Commissioner Survey Settlement and Land Records A.P. Hyderabad has already taken decision vide letter No.N1/5213/2010 dt: 27-9-2010 in the matter that Sec. 87 LR Act 1317 Fasli is not applicable to the present case. Inams Act is also not applicable to un-surveyed land. Since rights of private parties are not recognized or recorded in respect of un-surveyed lands. Such ands are to treated as lands vested in Government. Further in pursuance of the Commissioner Survey Settlement and Land Records A.P. Hyderabad assessment and observations the land be treated as Government land duly recording the land as poramboke under pattedar colum and showing the entire extent as pote kharab by assigning new Sy. Number 606 to an extent of Ac.21-04 gts in seriatim in village situated at Khanojiguda H/o Alwal Village Malkajgiri Mandal Ranga Reddy District with usual procedure.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top