Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.SURENDER, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, JJ
MR. POTHAM JAGANNADHAM NAIDU CHERLAPALLY JAIL – Appellant
Versus
P.P. HYD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused tried for murder (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. complaint lodged by husband (Para 5) |
| 3. investigation details (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. confession and recovery (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. prosecution's reliance on evidence (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 6. doubts on circumstantial evidence (Para 36 , 37) |
| 7. principles of circumstantial evidence (Para 38 , 39) |
| 8. acquittal of accused no.1 (Para 40) |
| 9. dismissal of state's appeal (Para 41) |
COMMON JUDGMENT:
1. Accused Nos.1 and 2 were tried for the offence of murder by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in SC.No.374/2015, wherein, A1 was convicted and A2 was acquitted.
2. Criminal Appeal No.405 of 2016 is filed by Accused No.1 questioning his conviction recorded by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in SC.No.374/2015 for the offences under Sections 302 , 379 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 302 of IPC ; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- for the offence under
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
