Back
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA C.M.A. NO: 908 OF 2019 Appeal Under Section 30 of Employees Compensation Act, '1923 against the Order of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-ll, Hyderabad in E.C.NO. 48 OF 2016 Between:
Shriram General lnsurance Co. Ltd, Represented by its Legal Officer, Stret No.S, Opposite Mitra Agencies, 4th Floor, Saidatta Arcade, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT/OPPOSITE PARTY NO.2 AND
1. Duragasi Chinnamulu, Wo Late Venkataramana, Age. 35 years, Occ:
Housewife
2. Baby D. Rupa, D/o Late Venkataramana, Age. 7 years, Occ: Student
3. Master Shyamala Rao, S/o Late Venkataramana, Age. 2 years, Occ: Nil
4. Mrs. Appamma, W/o D. Radhakrishna, Age. 55 years, Occ: Household Duties
5. Mr. D. Radhakrishna, S/o Taviti Naidu, Age. 60 years, Om Nil (Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are minors and are being Represented by their Mother and Natural Guardian Durgasi Chinnamulu i.e. Respondent No.1 herein)
All are Fi./o Plot No.17, Jupiter Colony, Kakaguda, Kharkana, Secunderabad, Natives of Vedulavalasa, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District
6.
M/s Sri Durga Bulk Transport, D.No.24-20-1, Ksari Dangappa Street, Kotha Veedhi, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. A. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos 1 to 5: SRI P. RAJESWARI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT /t THE H: N']3LE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA CN'IL ],,T IS_CELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.9O8 OF 2q ]!JI JTIDGMENT:
During the pendency of the appeal, the matter was relerred to Lok Adalat :urd the sarrre was settled before the Lok Adalat, vide Award dr. l),.O3.2022.
Accordingl''., the CMA is disposed of in terms of the Award passed by thr: L.ok Adalat. No order as to the costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous-petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
B.S, CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR \
rc //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Commission,:r for Employees Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of l--abour-ll, t. Anjaiah Karmika Sankshema Bhavan, RTC X Roads, Hyderabacl (with records)
2. One CC to SRl. A RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRl. P RAJESWARI, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy Alongwith a cc)py of Lok Adalath Award PSR )il-,x HIGH COURT PSS, J D AT E D : 2 8 I Oei I 2',.1: I 2"2 I*iE.f I.1
14.
JUDGMENT ^
0 Z ;nru zi:t CMA.No.90E of 2019 i/ ..
CMA DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT'H AWARD.
>v -l- A\'{-}
S1. AAq['-t t-.,..,,,,, 4,.4 Ac-t ) \
/ BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.
[Under Seclion l9 of the Legol Servkes Aulhorities Acl, I987 (Cenhol Act)l Date: 12-03-2022 Present: l. Hon'ble Justice c. Sri Devi SE.R s Chairman
2. Sri K.Venkatesh cupta, Advocate.
5Q lvlember o 5' 3. Smt.P.S.Maniula Kumar, Advocate, tlGt{
Lol( I Member Clr{A. No. 908 of 2019 (Before the Hon'ble High Court)
gete AGAINST E.C.No.48 of 2016 (On the fite of the Comniissioner for Emptoyees' Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-ll : T.Anjaiah Karmika Samkshema Bhayanam :
RTC 'X' Roads: Hyderabad)
Between:-
shriram General lnsurance Co-Ltd, Represented by its Legat Officer, Street No.5, Opposite Mitra Agencies, 4th Floor, Saidatta Arcade, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. .,.Appellant/
Opposite Party No-2 AND
1. Duragasi chinnamutu W/o. Late Venkataramana, Age: 35 years, Occ: Housewife
2.
Baty D.Rupa D/o Late Venkataramana, Age: 7 Years, Occ: Student
3. Llaster shyamata Rao S/o. tate venkataramana, Aged: 2 yea6, Occ: NiL
4. Mrs. Appamma W/o. D.Radhakrlshna, Age: 55 yea6, Occ: Househo{d Duties
5. Mr- D.Radhakrishna S/o Taviti Naidu, Age: 60 years, Occ: Ni[
(Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are minors and are being Represented by their rrlother and Natural Guardian Ou.gasi Chinnamutu i.e. Respondent N,o.I herein)
Att are R/o Ptot No. 17, Jupiter Cotony, l.€kaguda, Kharkana, Secunderabad, Natives of vedutavatasa, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram Oistrict ...Respondent Nos.'l to s/Applicants
5.
M/s. sri Durga Butk Transport, D.No. 24'20-1, Ksari Dangappa Street, Kotha Veedhi, Visakhapatnam ..Respondent No.6/Opposite Party No. 1 rW*
) ) \ +
Counsel for Appettant/()pposi:e Party No.2 5ri A.Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate lnsuranc€ Company Counset for Respondents/A )piicants smt.P.Rajeswari, Advocate/
Sri A.Purnachandra Rao, Advocate ,, This appeat having been ref ,rred for sett{ement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the pa.tie; .nd atso the parties, the following award is passed:
\
(*to(tt"*ut-t"\
AWARD
| Compensation Awarded by tne (.o.nmissioner for Employees' Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-ll, Hyd( rebad. | The total compensation of Rs.6r!$007/- (Bupees Six takhs forty eight thousand and seven onty) a(ong vri-th interest @ 12% per annum.on the amount. of ( i.e., Rs. 6,44,717 l -l ttom 28.06.2013 compensation titt the date of reatization. |
| Compensation Awarded (Setttement Reached) in th€ Lok Adatat. I d, 9ate | The Appettant/lnsurance Company has atready deposited total award amount before the Commissioner for Employees' Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour'll, Hyderabad. The Respondents/Applicants/Ctaimants have agreed to refund an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the lnsurance Company from out of the amount deposited and the same is to be refunded to the lnsurance Company i.e. Appettant herein. |
| Apportionment of Comp€nsatiol if any | The apportionment among .. t}le Re5pondents/ Appticants/Ctaimants shatt be\-.!!ade by the Commissioner of Emptoyees' compensation and Assistant Commissioner of tabour-ll, Hyderabad. |
Additional Direction(r):
1. The Appettant is entirk,d to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat.
2. The Respondents /Ap llrcants/ttaimants No.1 to 4 are permitted to withdraw their respective shares as )er the orders and apportionment made by the Commissioner for Employees' Compens.rtion and Assistant Cooimissioner of Labour-ll, Hyderabad.
ln token of consent ior the abovdsettl'ement and award, the partiei and their counset have signed this award in.,ur presence.
ln terms of the con promise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of.
51r"i-r-r^, 1'r t'i3 tr{ r"u' loB/z'11 o- ,. ,(*tp";""j;,*
chtt A-
tJC t.r\) 48lUe ;a
| Appellant (s) | Respondent (s) |
| For Shrlram Gerleral ce Co. Lt | |
