SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR STATE OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Vadde Murali – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard Mr. Mullangi Ram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and the present petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

2. The present criminal petition is filed by the petitioner - accused No.1 to quash the proceedings in Crime No.740 of 2021 of Jagathgirigutta Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections - 353, 447 and 427 of IPC and Section - 3 of the Public Property (Prevention of Damage) Act, 1985 (for short ‘Act, 1985’).

3. Perusal of record would reveal that on the complaint given by Village Revenue Officer, Gajularamaram Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Jagathgirigutta Police Station have registered a case in Crime No.625 of 2019 against the petitioner herein for the offences under Sections - 447, 427, 420 and 353 of IPC and Section - 3 of the Act,1985. The petitioner herein has filed a petition under Section - 482 of Cr.P.C. vide Crl.P. No.6441 of 2019 seeking to quash the proceedings in the said Crime No.625 of 2019. This Court vide order dated 16.10.2019 disposed of the said criminal petition di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top