SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
A.Avinash – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangna – Respondent


ORDER:

Hearc the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel ap ,earing for the 2',r respondent ancl tlte learned public Prosecutor

2. lhis Criminal Petition is filed to set aside the order dated 15-t 2-2017 in crl.M.p.No.433 0f 2017 in M.C.No.39 0f 2013 passt d by the Judge Pamily Court at Khammam District. The petitio rer herein is husband and the 2"a respondent is wife. The 2"a res pondent has frted a petition under Section 125 Cr.p.C vide M.C.N:.39 of 2013 seeking maintenance from the petitioner herein. I: L the said M.C., the petitioner herein has Iiled an applicatior under Section 294 ol Cr.P.C vide Crl.M.p.No.433 of 2Ol7 seek ng to receive certain documents and mark them as exhibits i.t ., "1. Moblle Phone. 2, Posltiue photographs (S) oJ the pet tloner ln M.C,, obtained from Jace book account of the petiti tner, 3, Memorandum of Understand.ing between the petlti tner and the respondent. 4, Mutual diuorce filed under Se:tlon 13(B) at Vijagauadd Familg Court betueen petitlonet and. respond.ent," The petitioner herein sought to file the sa d documents on the ground that there is conversation of the 2"d espondent in the said mobile phone which is useful for the purpo;e of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top