HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
A.Avinash – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangna – Respondent
ORDER:
Hearc the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel ap ,earing for the 2',r respondent ancl tlte learned public Prosecutor
2. lhis Criminal Petition is filed to set aside the order dated 15-t 2-2017 in crl.M.p.No.433 0f 2017 in M.C.No.39 0f 2013 passt d by the Judge Pamily Court at Khammam District. The petitio rer herein is husband and the 2"a respondent is wife. The 2"a res pondent has frted a petition under Section 125 Cr.p.C vide M.C.N:.39 of 2013 seeking maintenance from the petitioner herein. I: L the said M.C., the petitioner herein has Iiled an applicatior under Section 294 ol Cr.P.C vide Crl.M.p.No.433 of 2Ol7 seek ng to receive certain documents and mark them as exhibits i.t ., "1. Moblle Phone. 2, Posltiue photographs (S) oJ the pet tloner ln M.C,, obtained from Jace book account of the petiti tner, 3, Memorandum of Understand.ing between the petlti tner and the respondent. 4, Mutual diuorce filed under Se:tlon 13(B) at Vijagauadd Familg Court betueen petitlonet and. respond.ent," The petitioner herein sought to file the sa d documents on the ground that there is conversation of the 2"d espondent in the said mobile phone which is useful for the purpo;e of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.