Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
P.SREE SUDHA, J
Defendant No.2 – Appellant
Versus
Plaintiffs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. civil revision petition filed against trial court's order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's argument on the inadmissibility of the partition deed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of the partition suit and the document's status. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's reliance on precedents regarding unregistered documents. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. interpretation of the document's nature and requirements for registration. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. court's affirmation of the trial court's decision. (Para 13) |
| 7. civil revision petition dismissed. (Para 14) |
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/defendant No.2 aggrieved by the docket order dated 17.04.2023 in O.S.No.1658 of 2016 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Ibrahimpatnam.
2. An application filed in I.A.No.396 of 2022 to receive certain documents subject to proof and relevancy, which includes original partition deed dated 25.04.2001. During the marking of this document in O.S.No.1658 of 2023, learned counsel for the defendants raised objections regarding its admissibility in evidence contending that it should compulsorily be registrable document and, therefore the same cannot be received as evid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
