SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 15772

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
E. V. VENUGOPAL, J
E.SANTOSH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
Maruthi Info Tech – Respondent


ORDER:

1. This Criminal Appeal is filed by the petitioner/complainant aggrieved by the judgment dated 31.08.2017 in C.C.No.139 of 2017(old C.C. No.5 of 2017) passed by the learned XXI Special Magistrate, Hyderabad (for short, “the appellate Court”), confirming the judgment dated 24.03.2016 in C.C.No.185 of 2015 passed by the learned VIII Special Magistrate, L.B.Nagar, Hasthinapuram, Rangareddy District (for short, “the trial Court”).

2. Heard Saman Aafreen, learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.3-State. None appeared on behalf of respondent No.1/accused. Perused the record.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 representing respondent No.2/accused borrowed a sum of Rs.35,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty five lakhs only) from the petitioner/complainant to meet his business necessities and pledged a title deed with the petitioner/complainant promising to repay the same within six (6) months. On repeated demands to repay the said amount, when the cheque for a sum of Rs.35,00,000/- issued by respondent No.1 representing respondent No.2/accused was presented twice, the same was returned with an e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top