ORDER:

The petitioners, who are shown as accused in Crime No.124 of 2017 on the file of Matwada Police Station of Warangal District, has challenged the FIR in Crime No.124 of 2017 on the ground that the de-facto complainant/respondent No.2 has not followed the directions given by the Hon(cid:146)ble Supreme Court in Priyanka Srivastava & Anr vs State Of U.P.& Ors1.

2. The facts in brief, as can be gathered from the record, would go to show that the de-facto complainant is married with the brother of petitioner No.1/A1 and after giving birth to three daughters, on account of ill-health, her husband died. After the death of her husband, the petitioners, who are brothers and other close relatives of petitioner No.1, have started harassing the de-facto complainant in respect of partition of joint family properties and differences arose on which an attempt was allegedly made on the life of the de-facto complainant and she had to leave the house along with her children. By narrating the harassment meted out by the petitioners, the de-facto

1 (2015) 6 SCC 287

complainant has filed a complaint before the concerned Magistrate under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and the learned Magistrate has referred the