Agani Christopher vs Dr. A. Sharath, IAS - 2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 7759

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 7759

[ 3256 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRl JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE Noi2060F 2023 contempt case under Sections 10 ro 12 of contempt of courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for viorating, disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 23.O8.2022 in W.P.No.33263 of 2022.
Between:
1. A Flg /oa .n Ki- oc lh luri rs t Vo ip llah ge er, , RS a/o m L ca ht ae n R dra am pua ria ah m, a t\g i'e ad n da ab l,o Su at n5 gg a ry ee Oa Ors f, Do ic sc tr ic. tA .
g"r icurt -ure, 2. Ch.Uday Kumar, S/o. late Baburao, aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, Y&. yStiX[f 'ula vil lase, Narsi ns M"un ici paritv, Ga;aip;i Mft ,r,*H.,F;
3. A Kg oa llun ri . Vln ild lara gm e,m Ra a, mW ch/o a.
n dN ra ag pe us rah m, ag -Me ad n a db alo , u St a5 n0 g ay re eOar Os y, O Dc isc t r. i cA tg ."r ic-u- lt'u-r'e-', R' "l /o".' ...PETITIONERS AND Dr. A. Sharath, lAS, District Collector, Sanga Reddy, Sanga Reddy District.
...CONTEMNOR/RESPONDENT Counselfor the Petitioners: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent: Gp FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'8I,E SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDIII'EIT KUMAR CONTEMM CASE NO.2O6 OII 2O2i\

ORDER:

This } ntempr case is hled alleging non-co:nlrliance of the ordcr pasr;:d by this Court in W.P.No.33263 tf 2Ct22, dated

23.OA.202:)

2. Whe the matter is taken up for conside:-it,iorL, learned Assistirnt (l )vernment Pleader for Assignme;lt plac('d belore this Court, th proceedings bearing No.trl l29i'l 202',2 dated ,r

24.1t3.2O'.2:' arrd submitted that, in terms of the o -ri er ltassed by this (lourl the respondent has considere([ th: online applic:zLtion srtbmitted by the petitioners and issr.Led the said procce Cingr; rr jecting the claim of the petitioners tr'1' cc,nducting a detailed e r quiry.

Conlempt ()ase and hence, the respondent is liable for punishmen lor violating the order passed by thrs Ocrurt.

-II

2 MSK,J c.c.No.206 0F 2023

4. This Court, having perused the ings pl.oceed datcd

24.03.2023 and also taking into consideration of the facr that an elal-.orate enquiry has been undertaken by the respondent while issuing the said proceedings dated 24.03.2023, is of the considered view that there is nothing on record to prove that the respondent has deliberately delayed the matter and as such, in the absence of any proof of deliberate viclation of the order passed by this Court, this Court is not inciined to continue the contempt proceedings against the respondent.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to take appropriate action against the proceedings dated 24.03.2023, if they are otherwise advised.

There shall be no crder as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

SD/-M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Assignment, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies gbr iC,, Pf HIGH COURl DATED: 3110it1,2023 z{'. r4I r{E S €

I ,'., )\^

//'i <'\a1 r-) 1

0 rr,AY 2$Zl \-)

i.)+

ORDER .\i .-rr t i:-'

;/'-.

C.C.No.206 o,'2023 :

CLOSING TH CONTEMPT CASE crcl, rq\u\c-g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document