ORDER:

This } ntempr case is hled alleging non-co:nlrliance of the ordcr pasr;:d by this Court in W.P.No.33263 tf 2Ct22, dated

23.OA.202:)

2. Whe the matter is taken up for conside:-it,iorL, learned Assistirnt (l )vernment Pleader for Assignme;lt plac('d belore this Court, th proceedings bearing No.trl l29i'l 202',2 dated ,r

24.1t3.2O'.2:' arrd submitted that, in terms of the o -ri er ltassed by this (lourl the respondent has considere([ th: online applic:zLtion srtbmitted by the petitioners and issr.Led the said procce Cingr; rr jecting the claim of the petitioners tr'1' cc,nducting a detailed e r quiry.

1;

Conlempt ()ase and hence, the respondent is liable for punishmen lor violating the order passed by thrs Ocrurt.

-II

2 MSK,J c.c.No.206 0F 2023

4. This Court, having perused the ings pl.oceed datcd

24.03.2023 and also taking into consideration of the facr that an elal-.orate enquiry has been undertaken by the respondent while issuing the said proceedings dated 24.03.2023, is of the considered view that there is nothing on record to prove that the respondent has deliberately delayed the matter and as such, in the absence of any proof of deliberate viclation of the order passed by this Cour