ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Sri B.Jagan Madhav Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Smt.D.Madhavi, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of 4th respondent, and perused the record.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the lis involved in this Writ Petition, this Court is of the view that notice to respondent Nos.5 and 7 not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The case of the petitioners in brief is that though the impugned proceeding dated 22-08-2024 termed as ‘Notice’, it is in effect an order whereby the authority has already predetermined the issue as the petitioners were directed to remove the offending portion of the construction made, claiming as objecting the access of road (deviations) within 7 days, failing which, the petitioners were informed that the authorities would take further action for removing the aforesaid encroachment portion as per the provisions of the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019/TG-bPASS Ac