HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SUJANA, J
Smt. Vakula Kumari Surakanti – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Narsavva – Respondent
ORDER:
Challenging the order dated 04.04.2023 passed in I.A.No.296 of 2021 in O.S.No.26 of 2013 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent Nos.1 to 4/plaintiffs filed O.S.No.26 of 2013 under Order VII Rule 1 read with Section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘C.P.C.’) suit for partition and separate possession. During the pendency of the said suit, the petitioner/proposed defendant No.4 filed I.A.No.296 of 2021 under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., to implead the petitioner/defendant No.4 in the said suit. It is stated that the petitioner claims absolute ownership and possession of agricultural land, totaling Ac.5.05 guntas in New Kanjar, Laxmanchanda Mandal, Nirmal District, purchased from Tadisena Sumeeth Reddy via registered sale deed No.2643/2019. The history of the land shows it was initially allotted to Easari Pedda Bhumanna under the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme, then sold to Potha Reddy Narsareddy, who sold it to Koripelli Swapna, and eventually to the petitioner. The vendors of the petitioner had mutated their names in revenue records, re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.