SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 23432

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SUJANA, J
Smt. Vakula Kumari Surakanti – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Narsavva – Respondent


ORDER:

Challenging the order dated 04.04.2023 passed in I.A.No.296 of 2021 in O.S.No.26 of 2013 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Nirmal, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent Nos.1 to 4/plaintiffs filed O.S.No.26 of 2013 under Order VII Rule 1 read with Section 26 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘C.P.C.’) suit for partition and separate possession. During the pendency of the said suit, the petitioner/proposed defendant No.4 filed I.A.No.296 of 2021 under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151 of C.P.C., to implead the petitioner/defendant No.4 in the said suit. It is stated that the petitioner claims absolute ownership and possession of agricultural land, totaling Ac.5.05 guntas in New Kanjar, Laxmanchanda Mandal, Nirmal District, purchased from Tadisena Sumeeth Reddy via registered sale deed No.2643/2019. The history of the land shows it was initially allotted to Easari Pedda Bhumanna under the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme, then sold to Potha Reddy Narsareddy, who sold it to Koripelli Swapna, and eventually to the petitioner. The vendors of the petitioner had mutated their names in revenue records, re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top