SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

-t IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI ]USTICE K.LAKSHMAN CRL,P. NO: 6551 OF 2020 Between :

Jakkarthi Narsimha, S/o Ramachandram Petitioner/Accused AND The State ofTelangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad Through Hayathnagar Nagar Police Sta tio n .,..,Respondent Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition filed herein, the High Court may be. pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/A-2 on Anticipatory Bail in connection with the Crime No 523/20L8 of Hayathnagar P.S., Rachakonda, Ranga Reddy District in the event of his arrest The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Ch Ravinder, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public Prosecutor for the respondent, the Court made the following.

ORDER :#

TIIE HON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN CRTMINAL PETITION No.6551 of 2O2O ORDER:

This application is fi1ed seeking anticipatory bail. The petitioner is A2 has filecl a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. and the same was referred to the Police Hayathnagar under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and the same was registered as Crime No.523 of 2018 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda, Ranga Reddy District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 120b, 42O, 506,509 lPC, 156(3) Cr.P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Penrsed the record.

I On peruseil of the complaint would reveal that there are disputes with r,:gard to the property admeasuring 300 sq. yards situated in Sunrey No.184 part of Bagh Hayathnagar Revenue Village, Hayathnagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District between the petitioner and the de facto complainant. The said \

disputes are civjl in nature. There is no explanation muchless plausible expla.: ation by the police for the dela1, caused .in completing the i.rvestigation and filing of final report.

Considering the nature of the allegations and also that the crime was registered on 25.07.2018, the petitioner hcrein is ,A2, the disputes ar,: civil in nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail r-o the petitioner/A2.

Accordingll', this Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioner/A2 is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, HayathrLagar Police Station, within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner on bail on his executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.5,OOO/- (Rupees five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to his satisfaction. The petitioner shall report before the Station House Officer, Hayathnagar Police Station, on every Sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m. till completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet. Further the petitioner shal1 abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C and shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.

Sdi - K SHYI,ESHI REGISTRAR ESSTSTEI'TT COPY// //TRUE SECTION OFFICER 'o ytl y"-,,:fl:'l#:3;:'J:i:,?'.'."J:iB:,,1:1ili,'ff'3ii;l;l;?5)'-"""

2 " . ' Tn hu e Station House L n"iJ, oitttitt .. ^ --^^,.,-^. Hinh court at Hyderabad (oUT)

i*" tc' i"

'll;f3i1Y,l15?"?r';;

i. on" CC to Sri Ch R'

5. One spare coPY '

\

HIGH COURT KL,J DATED: lO.L2.2tC20

rrJ

ORDER:

CRLP. NO: 6551 r>f 2O2O BAIL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top