SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR STATE OF TELANGANA
CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA, J
Kunchala Ramanamma – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


ORDER:

Seeking to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners who are arrayed as respondent Nos.2 to 4 in DVC.No.lO of 2027 that is pending on the fiIe of the Court of Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

2.

Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor waives notice for respondent No. 1. Having regard to the limited question involved, issuance of notice to respon{ent No.2 is not felt necessary.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is the mother-in-1aw, petitioner No.2 is the father-in-1au,, petitioner No.3 is the sister-in-law of respondent No.2 and they have no connection with the affairs of the alleged aggrieved person and her husband and therefore, filing of a complaint against them by the alleged aggrieved person is bad in lau,.

tr.csL r , CrtPNo.sS56 oJ 2obi

4.

AII applications under the protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are required to be liled under Section 12 thereof_ The orders that would be normally sought for would be under Sections

18 to 22of the said Act and all the orders that would

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top