SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Jannapureddy Shiva Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Jannapureddy Thirupathi Reddy – Respondent


ORDER _-----.-_-

h--

I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY CRP No.2678 of 2019 ORDf,R:

. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed this civil revision petition I assailing the order and decree dated 14.10.2019 passed in IA No.245 of 2019 in OS No. 111 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Parkla, Warangal District.

?. lA No.245 of 2019 was tlled under Order-Xlll' Rule-3 read withSectionl5lolC.P.C.bythepetitioner/plaintitTtodeexhibit/

ol demark the Ex.B.l8 stating that it is a xerox copy application submitted to the Tahsildar under Right to, Information Act by the respondent/defendant on 27.09.2013, which is irrelevant document and as per Order-XIII, Rule-3 CPC, the Court may at any stage of the suit rej ect any document which it considers irrelevant or otherwise inadmissible, recording the grounds for such rejection' The learned counsel for the petitioner aiso relied upon the principles laid by this Court in Abttul Rafi @Abdut Rawoof v' Venkataish (died) by ll?sr' In that case, a petition was filed for demarking the document and this Court has held that the trial Court lailed to decide the objection raised by the petitioner and proceeded to receive in evidence an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top