SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 24180

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
Dr. Guduri Subramanya Susita – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners argue against fee hike (Para 3)
2. tafrc's authority upheld (Para 15)
3. writ petitions dismissed (Para 16 , 17)

COMMON ORDER:

Challenge in all these Writ Petitions is to G.O.Ms.No. 107, dated 28.07.2023 issued by the 1st respondent State of Telangana in its Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department. By the said G.O., annual tuition fee for Private Medical Un-aided Minority and Non-minority Professional institutions was hiked for the block period 2023-26 in the range of 118% to 554% which results in profiteering or collection of capitation fee by the colleges and gross commercialisation of Post-Graduate Medical/Dental Courses in the State, contends petitioners who appeared for post-graduate entrance exam held on 05.03.2023 by the National Eligibility and Entrance Test for the academic year 2023-24 and results thereof were declared on 14.03.2023.

2. Since the issue covered in all these Writ Petitions is one and the same, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.

3. The grievance of petitioners is that pursuant to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Islamic Academic of Education v. State of Karnataka, [2003(6) SCC 690],

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top