SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 23776

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
M/s Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chityala Jangamma – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated 01.11.2017 passed in Motor Vehicle Original Petition No.1131 of 2015 (impugned Order) by the learned XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short “the Tribunal”), appellant-Insurance company preferred the present Appeal praying this Court to set aside the impugned Order.

02. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their array before the Tribunal.

03. Brief facts of the case are that: Petitioners filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act , 1989 and Rule 475/1B of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 claiming compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- for the death of one Chityala Erra Anjaneyulu (hereinafter referred to as ‘the deceased’), who died in a Motor Vehicle Accident that occurred on 13.05.2015. Petitioner No.1 is the wife, petitioner Nos.2 to 4 are children of the deceased.

04. According to petitioners, on 13.05.2015 the deceased being labour, loaded gravels in their land and loaded into Tractor Trolley bearing No. AP 22 Y 1004 and AP 22 Y 1005 (hereinafter referred as ‘crime vehicle’) and was proceeding towards Jadcherla to sell the same. On the way

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top