HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
PULLA KARTHIK, J
M. Ashalu – Appellant
Versus
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
O R D E R:
With the consent of parties, this Writ Petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage.
2. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“...to issue writ, order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the 2nd respondent No.LC/WP/785(46) /2002- RM-KR, dated 17/01/2023 in not payment of difference retirement benefits of the petitioner by refixing the pay after restoration of two reduced increments as illegal and arbitrary and setaside the same and further direct the 2nd respondent to restore the reduced two increments and re fix the pay of the petitioner and pay difference retirement benefits to the petitioner on re fixed pay and pass...”
3. Heard Sri P.Govind Rajulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaddam Srinivas, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Road Transport Corporation for the respondents.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Conductor in the year, 1985 and retired from services on 30.06.2010 on attaining the age of superannuation. While in service, the Depot Manager, Sircilla, has imposed major punis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.