SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 22883

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Smt K.Anitha – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER :

Heard Mr. R.A. Chary, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. J.R. Manohar Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Endowment Department appearing on behalf of respondent No.4. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.5 is a non-existing.

2. The present writ petition is filed to declare the impugned order dated 27.08.2018 passed by respondent No.2 in Appeal No.B2/8002/2013, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently to declare the action of respondent No.4 in filing eviction petition before the Endowment Tribunal during pendency of civil suit vide O.S. No.352 of 2013 pending on the file of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, between the petitioners and respondent No.4, as null and void.

3.  CASE OF THE PETITIONERS:

i) The petitioners herein are the owners and possessors of their respective houses i.e., H. Nos.17-1-382/H/10, 17-1-382/H/13, 17-1- 382/H/1, 17-1-382/H/2, 17-1-382/H/6, 17-1-382/H/5, 17-1-382/H/12, 17-1-382/H/14, 17-1-382/H/1, 17-1-382/H/13, 17-1-382/H/15 and 17-1- 382/H/14, situated in Survey No.110 of Saidabad Villag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top