SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 246

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.SURENDER, J
SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER HYD. – Appellant
Versus
GURRAM DASARATHA REDDY AND 15 OTHERS – Respondent
CRLA/1719/2005



The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence for conviction.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22, 25, 25-A, 27-A, 29, 50, and 42 - Appeal against acquittal - The trial court acquitted the accused due to non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act, leading to a lack of credible evidence for conviction - The prosecution's reliance on field test results was deemed insufficient without proper corroboration - The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing the need for substantial reasons to overturn trial court decisions. (Paras 19, 20, 32, 42)

(B) Appeal against acquittal - The appellate court must exercise caution and only disturb acquittals with compelling reasons, respecting the presumption of innocence. (Paras 40, 41)

Facts of the case:
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence challenged the acquittal of multiple accused involved in the alleged manufacture of Methaqualone, a psychotropic substance, citing procedural violations during searches and seizures. The trial court found significant lapses in the prosecution's adherence to statutory requirements.

Findings of Court:
The trial court's acquittal was based on the prosecution's failure to comply with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, leading to insufficient evidence for conviction.

Issues: The main issues included the legality of the search and seizure operations and the adequacy of evidence presented by the prosecution.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's findings, noting that violations of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act compromised the prosecution's case, and emphasized the principle that acquittals should not be overturned without compelling reasons.

Result: Criminal Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. search operations conducted (Para 2)
2. evidence collected during searches (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. trial court's findings (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
4. appeal dismissed (Para 43)

JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by DRI (Directorate of Revenue Intelligence), challenging the acquittal recorded by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in S.C.No.350/2002, vide Judgment dt.30.06.2005, for the offences under Sections 22, 25, 27-A & 29 of NDPS Act against A1; 22, 25-A, 27-A & 29 of NDPS Act against A2; 22, 27-A, 29 of NDPS Act against A3; 22, 29 of NDPS Act against A4; 22, 25 & 29 of NDPS Act against A5; 22, 25 & 29 of NDPS Act against A6; 22, 25 & 29 of NDPS Act against A7; 22 of NDPS Act against A8; 22 & 25 of NDPS Act against A9; 22 of NDPS Act against A10; 22 of NDPS Act against A11; 25-A & 31 of NDPS Act against A12; 25-A of NDPS Act against A13 to A16.

2. The case of the prosecution is that specific intelligence was gathered which indicated that Methaqualone, a Psychotropic Substance specified in the schedule to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘NDPS Act’) was being manufactured at M/s.Neepa Chem Laboratories Private Limited, located at Survey No.441, Brahmanpally Road, Bibinagar, Nalgonda District and further being converted into tablets at H.No.1-1, Masanpally Village, Basheerabad Mandal, Ranga Redddy District. The gist of intelligence was recorded by LW.1-S.Yanadi Reddy, Senior Intelligence Officer and in compliance with section 42 of the NDPS Act, LW.1-S.Yanadi Reddy reported the gist of intelligence to his immediate official superior LW.2- M.Subramanyam, Senior Deputy Director vide letter dated 9.05.2002. On the basis of search authorizations issued by LW.1- S.Yadagiri Reddy, the officer of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence along with Central Excise Officer conducted search at the above mentioned premises on 10.05.2002 in the presence of independent witnesses and the proceedings were drawn under the respective panchanamas dated 10.05.2002.

3. The search party headed by LW.3-A.V.S.Mallikharjuna Rao, Intelligence Officer conducted the search of Plant-II (New Shed) of M/s.Neepa Chem Laboratories Private Limited, Survey No.441, Brahmanpally Road, Bibinagar, Nalgonda District, in the presence of two independent witnesses LW.4-P.Ramesh and LW.5- I.Swamanna. At that time A8 was present and later A1, A2 and A3 came to the premises. The process of operations were in progress. During the search, off-white coloured powder packed in 10 polythene bags on the machine floor and certain quantity of off white coloured powder in the drying-chamber, besides other chemicals, reaction mass and in-process residue were found. The officers conducted tests on the off-white coloured powder with the help of a field-test-kit brought by them and the same tested positive for the presence of Methaqualone, a psychotropic substance specified in the scheduled to the NDPS Act. The officers also searched a Tata Safari vehicle bearing No.AP 9AC 9145 parked at the said premises and recovered a passport bearing No.72723 issued in the name of A2 and a polythene cover containing off- white coloured powder, which also tested positive for the presence of Methaqualone. Before conducting the personal search of A1, A2, A3 and A8, they were asked whether they would like to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. They informed that they had no objection to be searched before any Officer. Thereafter, the personal search of the above accused persons was conducted before LW.6-Shaik Khan Saheb, Superintendent of Central Excise who is a Gazetted officer. Nothing was recovered from the personal search of A1. The incriminating documents recovered from A2 include, among others, a slip showing requirement of bags which later was identified as in the hand-writing of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top