ORDER

Heard Smt. Thakur Roopa Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment for 5^th respondent.

2. Petitioners herein are claiming that they are the absolute owners and possessors of Plot No.33-A admeasuring 200 square yards in Survey No.207, situated at Sri Ramnagar, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on the strength of a registered Sale Deed bearing Document No.18157 of 2024 dated 07.10.2024. They have obtained building permit order dated 05.11.2024 for construction of Stilt for parking + 2 upper floors. Petitioners have not commenced construction. In the meanwhile, 3^rd respondent has issued show cause notice dated 11.11.2024 stating as follows:

“The Provisional permission obtained for construction of individual Residential Building vide reference 1^st cited, has been examined in detail by the Post Verification team as per the rules and regulations in force. It is noticed that it has been obtained by suppressing the material facts and by misrepresentation of documents facts as stated below:

“As per the scrutiny and inspection report of TPS & ACP- 20, Sri MANCHALA VINEET, S/O. SRI MANCHALA PRAVEEN KUMAR, 2. MR.MANCHALA VISHAL KUMAR, S/O.SRI MANCHALA RAVI KUMAR, 3. MR.MITTAKANTI VAMSHIDHAR REDDY, S/O.SRI MITTAKANTI PURUSHOTHAM REDDY, 4. MR.MITTAKANTI ANUDEEP REDDY, submitted proposals the construction of residential building consist of 1 stilt + 2 upper floors over the Plot No: PLOT BEARING NO:303-A, Locality: SRI RAMNAGAR, Survey No: 207, Gachibowli(V), Serilingampally Circle 20, Serilingampally Zone, Serilingampally(M), GHMC, Rangareddy (Dist). Inspected the site, verified the submitted documents and observed that, the survey numbers 207 are covered under prohibited properties as CEILING SURPLUS LAND. Prior NOC is required from the concerned authorities for issue of building permission. The applicant has not submitted any document with regard to the regularization of said plot from the ULC authorities, In this regard, a show cause notice may be issued to the applicant with a direction to show cause as to why the provisional permission obtained by self-certification should not be revoked within 7 days, otherwise the same will be cancelled without any further notice.”

Hence you are hereby directed to show cause in writing as to why the provisional permission obtained by you shouldn’t be revoked for the reasons stated as above. Your explanation should be submitted within 7 days from the date of receipt of this notice, failing which the provisional permission granted will be revoked without further notice.”

3. 3^rd respondent directed the petitioners to submit explanation within seven days. When the petitioners went to the office of the 3^rd respondent to explain the same orally, he refused to hear the same. Thus, according to the petitioners, they have submitted explanation orally. Without considering the same, 3rd respondent has issued revocation letter dated 06.12.2024 revoking the aforesaid building permit order. Challenging the same, petitioners filed the present writ petition.

4. Whereas, Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4, on instructions, would submit that 3^rd respondent has issued show cause notice dated 11.11.2024 with the aforesaid allegations and despite granting seven days time, petitioners herein failed to submit explanation. Therefore, 3rd respondent has revoked the building permit order dated 11.11.2024 vide revocation letter dated 06.12.2024. There is no error in it.

5. Perusal of revocation letter would reveal that there is no reference to the show cause notice dated 11.11.2024.

6. As discussed supra, the building permit order is dated 05.11.2024. Petitioners obtained the said building permit order under Telangana State Building Permission Approval and Self Certification System (TS-bPASS) Act, 2020 by uplo