COMMON ORDER:

4.

The revision petitioner is the defendant in a suit filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money of Rs.63,79,95 11. The revision petitioner fi1ed I.A.No.953 of 2012 to set aside the ex parte decree and another I.A.No.l860 of 2011 for staying execution pctition fl lerl urrcler Order 2l Rule 26 C.P.C. and both thc applications arc pending be tbre the Court below. I.A.No. 1860 of 201 I was alloued in lavour olthe revision petitioner on 09.04.2012 staying the execution o1'dccree urltil lufther orders. When the said application came-up ltrr heirring on 02.08.201 9, the same was dismisscd due to absence o1'both the parties and their counsel. Then I.A.No. 1326 of 2019 u'as llled to condone the delay ol(28) days in filing the petition for restoration o1'1.A.No.953 of 2012 and I.A.No.l327 of 2019 was filed to condone the delay of (28) days in filing the petition for restoration of I.A.No.1860 of 201 I to its original number. Thc trial Couft after hearing both the counsel and after perusing thc material on record dismissed both I.A.No.l326 and 1327 of 2019, vide comnron order, dated 04.11.2019. Aggrieved by the same, the present revisions are filed.

5.

A perusal of the c