SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 1211

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
P. SAM KOSHY, J
Maheswarapu Srinivas Sarma – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Uradi Anjamma – Respondent


COMMON ORDER :

These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioners under article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the orders dated 31.12.2024 passed in I.A.Nos.893 & 894 of 2024 in O.S.No.87 of 2016 by the Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Chevella.

2. Heard Mr.G.Vasantha Rayudu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the material available on record.

3. Vide the impugned order, the petition filed by the petitioner seeking impleadment as defendant No.9 in the suit stands rejected, leading to the filing of the instant civil revision petitions.

4. The plaintiff had filed a suit for partition and separate possession against the defendant Nos.1 to 8. The suit was filed as early as in the year 2016. The defendant No.2 to 8 inspite of proper service and even after paper publication also chose not to contest the case and therefore, were proceed exparte. Only defendant No.1 was contesting the matter. The written statement was filed by defendant No.1 on 19.09.2022. The evidence were all closed and the matter now stands fixed for the final arguments in the suit. It is at this stage that the petition under Order I Rule 10 has been filed seeking for impleadm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top