SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 244

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
Avunoori Suguna – Appellant
Versus
Sayyad Mahaboob – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

1. Dissatisfied with the compensation amount awarded by the Family Court Judge –cum- Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, in M.V.O.P.No.330 of 2014, dated 09.10.2019, the claim petitioners in the said M.V.O.P. preferred the present Appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter be referred as they were arrayed before the learned Tribunal.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the claim petitioners, who are the wife, daughters and parents of Late Avunoori Swamy (hereinafter be referred as ‘the deceased’), filed a petition under Section 166 (1)(c) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of Rs.14,00,000/- from the respondents on account of the death of the deceased in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 12.01.2014. It is stated by the petitioners that on 12.01.2014 during morning hours, when the deceased was proceeding to Peddapalli to attend his work as driver on the Tractor Bearing No.AP-07-G- 4564 for cutting trees, on the way at about 10.00 AM, when he reached at the outskirts of Sabbitham Village, in the meantime, a Lorry Bearing No.AP-28-V-6160 which came from Peddapalli towards Adavi Srirampur si

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top