SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 2890

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
K. Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP.No:41139 of 2015 | WPMP. NO. 53101 OF 2015



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar
For the Respondents: GP for Revenue, (TG), GP for Irrigation, (TG)

Eviction without due process and notice is impermissible under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition filed against eviction from quarters without notice - Petitioners claimed eviction was illegal and arbitrary, violating principles of natural justice - Respondents argued eviction was necessary due to dilapidated condition of houses - Court held that status quo must be maintained until due process is followed. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

(B) Due Process - Court emphasized the necessity of following legal procedures before eviction - Lack of notices to petitioners was a significant concern.

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged eviction from their quarters, claiming it was arbitrary and without due process, while respondents cited the condition of the houses as justification for eviction.

Findings of Court:
Court ordered maintenance of status quo regarding possession until a specified date, allowing respondents to issue notices in accordance with law.

Issues: The key issue was whether the eviction process adhered to legal requirements and due process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed the importance of due process in eviction proceedings, stating that eviction without notice is impermissible.

Result: Status quo maintained until 25-01-2016.

Table of Content
1. respondents justify eviction based on property condition. (Para 4)
2. court maintains status quo pending legal process. (Para 5 , 6)
3. due process is essential in eviction cases. (Para 7)
4. court orders status quo to be maintained. (Para 8)

ORDER:

“Learned counsel for the petitioners mainly submits that inspite of the letter dated 05-10-2015 issued by the Superintending Engineer, NSLBC O & M Circle, Tekulapally, Khammam, and communication of the said letter to the Government on 30-10-2015, respondent-authorities are trying to take steps to demolish the houses where the petitioners are living.

On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel submits that since the houses are in dilapidated condition, they are taking steps to evict the petitioners in terms of Division Bench Judgment of this Court in WP. No. 20756 of 2011, wherein this Court directed the concerned respondents to take steps for eviction, in accordance with law and complete the same within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of that order.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no notices were issued to the petitioner for eviction.

Learned Government Pleader submits that he is not in a position to place on record the documents showing issuance of notices to the petitioners seeking their eviction before taking any coercive steps. However, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 states that as on today they are not taking any steps for eviction of the petitioners.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the letter dated

05-10-2015 issued by the Superintending Engineer, NSLBC O&M Circle, Status quo with regard to the possession as on today shall be maintained till 25-01-2016.

Post on 19-01-2016. Meanwhile, respondents if so desire, can initiate the process of issuing notices in accordance with law.”

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Khammam

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam

4. The Tahasildar, Khammam Urban (M), Khammam District

5. The Principal Secretary, Major Irrigation & CAD Department, (ERD-

CE’S Estt), Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

6. The Superintending Engineer, Nagarjuna Sagar left Bank Canal, O &

M, Tekulapally, Khammam, Khammam District. (Addressees 1 o 6 BY RPAD)

7. Two CCs to GP for Irrigation, (TG), High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)

8. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, (TG), High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)

9. One CC to Sri Kowturu Vinaya Kumar, Advocate (OPUC)

10. One Spare Copy HIGH COURT AB DRAFTEDON 6-1-2016 CPKJ DATE: 6-1-2016

ORDER

WP. NO. 41139 OF 2015 STATUS QUO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top