SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 2310

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Radha Kishan Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Sri E. Uma Maheshwar Rao, learned counsel representing Sri E.Sudhanshu Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Palle Nageshwar Rao, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for State, Sri Seshadri Goalla, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.

2. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.1205 of 2024 pending on the file of Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad.

Facts of the case:-

3. The petitioner herein is A.2. The offences alleged against the petitioner herein are punishable under Section 120-B, 386, 409 and 506 read with 34 of IPC and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2008 ( for short, ‘the IT Act’).

4. On the complaint lodged by 2nd respondent dated 01.12.2024, the Police Panjagutta, registered a case in Cr.No.1205 of 2024 against the petitioner herein and other accused for the aforesaid offences.

5. As per the said complaint dated 01.12.2024 of 2nd respondent, the allegations leveled against the petitioner herein and A.1 are as follows:-

i. On 21.03.2021, he started the "Farmers First Foundation" at GS chambers, Nagarjuna Circle, Panjagutta, wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top