Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. D.SHANKARAMMA KAVITHA AND 7 OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim petition filed for compensation (Para 3) |
| 2. accident details and police investigation (Para 4) |
| 3. details of deceased's earnings (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. insurance company's denial of claims (Para 7) |
| 5. tribunal's findings on evidence (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. arguments by insurance company (Para 12 , 14) |
| 7. arguments by claim petitioners (Para 13) |
| 8. evidence of eyewitness (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 9. final compensation awarded (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned District Judge – cum- Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mahabubnagar, in O.P.No.669 of 2006, dated 30.01.2009, the 3rd respondent/Insurance Company in the said O.P. preferred the present Appeal seeking to allow the Appeal by setting aside the order of the learned Tribunal. Also, dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, the Petitioners in the said O.P. filed Cross-Objections No.1 of 2016 seeking enhancement of compensation.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter be referred as they were arrayed before the learned Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the claim petitioners, who are the wife, children and parents of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
