SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 2073

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
Bhukya Bhadru – Appellant
Versus
Bhukya Krishna – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff filed suit under agency rules (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 11 , 12)
2. opposition to remand by respondent (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. agent to government failed to appreciate facts (Para 9)
4. judicial trend to record reasons (Para 10)
5. reasons are essential for justice (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. matter remitted for fresh adjudication (Para 16)

JUDGMENT:

The Appeal Suit is filed by the defendants against the judgment dated 12.07.2023 passed in O.S.No.91 of 2021 by the Court of the Agent to Government, Bhadradri Kothagudem.

2. The appellants herein are the defendants and the respondent herein in is the plaintiff in the suit. For convenience, the parties herein after referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

3. The facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed suit vide O.S.No.91 of 2021 under Rule 7 of Agency Rules , 1924, read with Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC for declaration and perpetual injunction under Sections 34 and 38 of Specific Relief Act . By the impugned order, the trial Court decreed the suit which reads as under:-

“As a result, the Court instructs the Tahsildar of Kothagudem to annul defendant No.2’s existing passbook, specifically the portion measur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top