SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 4431

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. SUJANA, J
Nawabpet Sujatha – Appellant
Versus
Yellakonda Chandrasekhar Reddy – Respondent


ORDER:

This revision petition is preferred by the revision petitioner challenging the order dated 19.06.2024 passed in IA.No.350 of 2024 in CMA.No.5 of 2024 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vikarabad District.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the revision petitioner filed IA.No.350 of 2024 under Section 151 of CPC to de-number CMA.No.5 of 2024 contending that the same is not maintainable in the absence of appropriate application to condone the abnormal delay in filing the same, and averring that despite being aware of the orders passed in IA No.1618 of 2019 dated 29.03.2023, CMA.No.254 of 2023 was filed with malicious intent to harass the petitioner through frivolous litigation, causing unnecessary delay and wasting over a year without separating the share of the property of petitioner. Further, that after the dismissal of the said CMA., the respondents filed CMA.No.5 of 2024 without condoning the inordinate delay, misleading the Court and obtaining a numbered filing without submitting a supporting application to condone the delay, thereby, abusing the legal process with malafide intentions, rendering the petition non-maintainable without condoning the delay. Afte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top