SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 3862

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
P.SAM KOSHY, NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, JJ
K. SARITHARANI SANGAREDDY AND 13 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Secretary – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

(per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Ms.Divya Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.41256 of 2016 and W.P.No.31381 of 2022, Mr.G.U.R.C.Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.27270 of 2018 and W.P.No.31375 of 2022, Ms.M.Shalini, learned Government Pleader for Services-II, Mr.Y.Sai Sankalp, learned counsel representing Mr.Y.Rama Rao, along with Mr.A.Kranti Kumar Reddy, Ms.P.Namratha, Ms.Vedula Chitralekha, learned Standing Counsel for High Court for the State of Telangana, Ms.S.Suman learned Government Pleader for Finance Department, and Mr.A.Raghuram, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the State of Andhra Pradesh. Perused the material available on record.

2. These are four writ petitions which have been filed for the same relief. These writ petitions were filed in the year 2016, 2018 and in the year 2022.

3. The substantive relief that the petitioner had sought for in W.P.No.41256 of 2016 was setting aside of the order dated 29.09.2016, by which the services of the petitioners as Court Managers were discontinued.

4. However, pursuant to an interim direction given by this High Court, these petitioners were taken back in service and in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top