Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
M.G.PRIYADARSINI, J
MADISHETTY.PRATHAP – Appellant
Versus
ADAPA.SRINIVAS AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. counsel for the appellant (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. observations on evidence (Para 6) |
| 3. question of evidence (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. discrepancies in testimonies (Para 10) |
| 5. victim's death (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. evidence of witnesses (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. burden of proof (Para 25) |
| 8. appeal dismissed (Para 26) |
JUDGMENT:
The Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant-father of the victim questioning the Judgment dated 29.04.2011 in Criminal appeal No.116 of 2010 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge at Adilabad, wherein the Judgment dated 27.11.2010 passed by the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Mancherial, Adilabad District in C.C.No.4656 of 2005 convicting the accused for the offences under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (for short “ IPC ”) was set aside.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they were arrayed before the trial Court.
3. The brief facts of the case in nutshell are as under:
a) The victim/de-facto complainant by name Adapa Divya lodged complaint with Police, Mancherial against accused Nos.1 to 3 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
