Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J
petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 4 – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. proceedings based on insufficient accusations. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented on both sides regarding innocence. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. legal provisions and their applicability are discussed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling allows the petition and addresses seized property. (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’) by the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 4 to quash the proceedings against them in FIR No.371 of 2024 of P.S. Malakpet, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha , 2023 (for short ‘BNS’)(previously Section 420 of IPC) and Section 20 (2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act (for short ‘COTP Act’).
2. Heard Sri Y.Bala Murali, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-respondent.
3. Basing on the complaint dated 05.10.2024 that the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 were storing and distributing the banned foreign ci
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
