SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 1328

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
N. Kalpana – Appellant
Versus
The Telangana Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner claims ownership (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8)
2. petitioner's claim of illegality (Para 6)
3. notice issued without prior notice (Para 7)
4. due process must be followed (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

ORDER:

Heard Sri G.V.Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“… to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 straightway SC No.271105500” without a giving sufficient time whatsoever to the petitioner, at the order of the 5th respondent as wholly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and against the principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to restore the service connection for the electricity meter bearing SC No.271105500 and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and interest of justice.

3. The case of the petitioner, in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top