Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K.SURENDER, J
Dinesh Varma – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana And Another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed by district legal metrology officer (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioners argue vicarious liability (Para 8) |
| 3. public prosecutor argues delivery involvement (Para 9) |
| 4. legal metrology act ensures consumer protection (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. section 18 regulates pre-packaged commodities (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 30) |
| 6. logistics company not liable under act (Para 28) |
| 7. proceedings against petitioners quashed (Para 29) |
COMMON JUDGMENT:
1. Criminal Petition No. 4560 of 2019 is filed by Accused No.3, Criminal Petition No. 5016 of 2019 is filed by Accused No. 7, Criminal Petition No.5019 of 2019 is filed by Accused No. 2, Criminal Petition No.5029 of 2019 is filed by Accused No. 4, Criminal Petition No.5030 of 2019 is filed by Accused No. 6, and Criminal Petition No.5031 of 2019 is filed by Accused No. 5, invoking Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, seeking quashing of proceedings in S.T.C. No. 48 of 2019 pending on the file of XXII Metropolitan Magistrate, Medchal.
2. Since all the Criminal Petitions are questioning the proceedings against them in the same case, i.e., STC No.48 of 2019, all the petitions are dis
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
