Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
SHILAMPUR RAJU PATEL – Appellant
Versus
SHILAMPUR HAUGI RAO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs filed suit for title (Para 4) |
| 2. defendants argued for rejection (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. trial court's reasoning (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. cause of action must be established (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. second appeal dismissed (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT:
This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 09.12.204 in A.S.No.4 of 2023 on the file of the V Additional District Judge at Bodhan, Nizamabad District, wherein and whereby the judgment and decree dated 06.01.2023 in I.A.No.78 of 2022 in O.S.No.1 of 2021 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Bodhan, was set aside.
2. Heard Sri M.Achuta Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants. Perused the record.
3. The appellants are defendants and respondents are plaintiffs. For convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed before the trial court.
4. Brief facts leading to filing of the present second appeal are that plaintiffs-respondents have filed the suit in O.S.No.1 of 2021 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Bodhan for declaration of title and recovery of possession in respect of open plot No.6-A to extent of 14,000 sq.feet=1555.55 sq.yds situated at back side of officers
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
